Author Archiv

This way and that – a guide through the jungle of International PR

When talking to marketers and PR professionals in industry, we hear an audible sigh when the words international PR are mentioned. It is a lot of work, it costs a lot of money and it is so complicated. Are there any shortcuts, people ask. Well, there are no shortcuts but help is at hand. Running the Business Centre for the international Public Relations Network (PRN) I would like to share a few insights.

Iconworldmap3-1024x533 in One frequent question is: Why does PR on an international scale seem so complicated when we continually hear that the world is so small and that cultural habits are converging to a large extent? The simple answer is that although on the surface the world seems a smaller place, the sensibilities of a national audience are still very particular. The world is, as ever, a very large place and in this geographical expanse of land are countries that are all completely different from one another. This can be illustrated by the fact for example that although Germany, Austria and Switzerland are all German-speaking countries, this is where the similarity begins and ends. Public relations means relating to the public, if the public is different everywhere, so thus is public relations.

One December morning a while ago, Sympra received a call from the Marketing Director of a leading food company. He had been landed with the task of planning an international campaign in 11 different countries and had a timeframe of 7 weeks (including the Christmas and New Year period). He had to plan not only the complete presence of the company at the Fair but also interest foreign journalists and invite them to visit his company’s stand as well as get media coverage all over Europe. His materials to date included a basic press kit in English. His mood was naturally bleak. How was he going to manage? Sympra and the Public Relations Network shouldered his workload and here are some Do and Don’t tips we shared with him.

Don’t just have a translation agency translate your press release and then send it abroad. This never works. Journalists everywhere are inundated with news pieces from everywhere. The chance that your message is going to be picked up is slim to non-existent. Journalists open mails from people they know, they speak to sources they trust and they publish a topic of interest in a language that is suited to their target audience and not just a translation of a piece targeted at another market with a couple of local facts.

Do keep your news local and make sure that it really is news. To give a banal example: In Spain it is not news that a German company has opened, restructured itself or changed its name, even if this company also has a subsidiary in Spain. If it does not impact the Spanish market, it is not news to the Spanish. It is news however if this company is providing jobs in the country. Once you have your news, you need to have it translated into the local language. This translation now needs to be verified. Please do remember, translators are translators – they are not writers and they do not know what journalists in your target country are looking for. This brings me onto my next point:

Do work with a local agency you can trust. An agency has a team of writers that know what their journalist colleagues want. These communication experts have been working with journalists and your key publications for years and can not only turn a mediocre translation into a journalistic piece for the media but they can also more often than not, due to their age old contacts with journalists and editors, get your piece into the publications you need. Of course, there is never any 100% guarantee and a good agency will never give you a guarantee as press freedom still remains one of the cornerstones of our democracy, but if they think it is newsworthy, they know what they are talking about!

Do listen to your agency. What works in one country does not necessarily work in another. This is a crucial point as it challenges all our knowledge of what we have learnt about PR in our country. Sometimes, we have to let go of preconceived ideas and listen to the experts in the target country…they know what they are doing as they are on the frontline of communication.

Being intensively involved in the setting up of an international PR network and hand-picking member agencies around the world, we are well-versed in communication abroad. And it is not easy. Although the agencies we have selected are like-minded communication experts, we still make sure that our partner has understood what is required. The bigger networks often don’t know their partners abroad and work with them from job to job so they have to learn to communicate with their partners while working for the client. Thankfully, we have been through this process – we know that we won’t get French journalists to a breakfast meeting because our French PR colleagues are not keen on this either. Fine delicacies but we are pleased that we have learnt these things before working on a job for our clients – saving time and a lot of energy!

The international PR jungle is a vast and varied one and there are traps where you least expect them but there are guides to get you through and they are certainly worth investing in.

If you are interested in learning more about how international public relations works in practice, visit the event Commerce meets international communication at the Town Hall in Stuttgart (Rathaus Stuttgart) on 24th March from 11.00 am – 2.00 pm, entrance is free. For more information click here.

Who sets the agenda?

Kommsthiernichtrein Schiffner Photocase6be867kp1 in Why should journalism be any different from the way television programmes are aired nowadays? With Twitter and other social media channels people have not only found their voice, they have also learnt how to form an opinion and then put it out there onto the airwaves. This is true of television and now this is increasingly true of print journalism. With the rise of the global economic downturn, the world of journalism and the public sphere is being liberated. If a newspaper cannot afford to be printed, then it is forced to move online, if the medium shifts from print to electronic then social media comes to the fore with blogs and twitter possibilities for readers – the public will answer back and they will answer back loudly, clearly and with an eloquence that is unprecedented – it seems that this shift will enable us to move out of the time capsule where the public agenda was set by journalists and editors. Of course, once these people are online, they can find out hordes of information. Links onto other sites will guide them quickly and efficiently and with practice many will train themselves to discern the “truth” without the engaging smile of a politician trying to convince them of the opposite.

And if the agenda is actually set by the public what are the consequences of this? Will the ramifications on the way politics is practiced also change immensely? Will politicians actually hear what people have to say (because they are saying it again and again) and be forced to act upon the issues raised by the masses? Can they act on our concerns? Do they know how? It seems that this two way communication possibility in journalism is bringing us to the brink of an agenda-setting revolution. By accident, people may actually have the voice that has been denied over the centuries. A coincidence of timelines: an economic downturn forcing some newspapers to be present online only and the rise of social media enabling opinions to be put out there may just be the start of a new type of enfranchising democracy.

But we obviously have to ask ourselves: Is this what we really want? To be taken out of our comfort zone of non-information where the blankets are woolly and where we don’t have a bad conscience about not acting because, well, no one listens anyway? The point is – if we have a voice, then do we not have to make a decision about whether to use it? And if we don’t use it, can we still live with ourselves? Is it not simply easier for us to just read our newspaper and watch the national news every day and have our agenda set for us? Have it filtered for us by journalists? If it isn’t set for us how will we possibly ever have an overview of the agenda…there are so many hundreds of issues, in our fast-paced world where we have to look out for Number One, will we not confuse and trip ourselves up whilst trying to empower ourselves?

And how about those that are disempowered by this digital divide? My father-in-law, who is 86, has asked me several times where the “play” button is on the computer? The internet is a Pandora’s Box for him…something he never ever wants to open as it reminds him of where he is not: In a world that is fast, furious and without any kind of boundaries. If you snooze you lose and if you can’t use the internet, well then can you make an informed decision at all? I suppose that would be a job for unemployed journalists, they could always turn into professional bloggers and, in essence, do the same job as before!

[Foto: Schiffner | photocase.com]

I twitter therefore I am?

Photocase6qf78a8y1-300x289 in Facebook status messages, twitter et al have been playing a huge role in our society for some time now. At our last PRN meeting all the agencies confirmed the significant increase in online social media PR that they were doing. Not really a surprising development. A few years ago, I had lost all contact with most of my old school and uni friends – had no idea what was happening in their lives – were they married, were they divorced, were they still alive even? Now, Facebook not only allows access to their lives and core data: married, 2 children, interested in dogs, cats and the state of the world, but I’m also provided with information such as “I got into a scrap with the taxi driver last night” and “I had a wild time and spent the whole night suffering on for it” – really who cares? In the past year we have gone from absolutely no information to far too much information and more interestingly, information that is completely irrelevant and that no-one is even interested in. In a world of advertising and fierce marketing have we come to the point where we continually have to market ourselves? If we aren’t on Facebook, we have no face, we don’t exist? If we don’t continually write status messages, we have no status?

Sitting at the airport with a colleague a few weeks ago, he logged onto Twitter and read the following feed from a friend: “I’m sitting at the station in Berlin” – oh this begs, begs, begs the question “who really, really cares?”. Had he written “I’m sitting in Berlin and am surrounded by people who are bumping into me and are inconsiderate” or “The sun is shining and I feel positive”, I can do something with this information, I feel an emotion but what can I do with I’m sitting at the station – sorry, not interesting unless I am planning on picking him up. I wonder – is this one newsbyte the most he can say about himself? If that’s the most he has to say to put himself out there, let’s hope he doesn’t work in any kind of creative industry.

Is this what communication nowadays has come down to? Feeds that no-one is interested in – one way pieces of irrelevant communication? And if so, what are we supposed to do with this information? Can we possibly find it interesting because it shows a person’s attitude to everyday events – are we supposed to look behind the feed “I’m sitting at the station in Berlin” and meant to read “I’m busy and important because I am jetting around the country?” In effect, we have to “look behind” the twitter if we want a dialogue or conversation to go further – is this really communication now – one-liners that everyone ignores. Have we become a one-byte society? Do we have to put ourselves out there to show we exist – I twitter therefore I am?

International Public Relations: Confirming stereotypes or meeting new worlds?

Logoprn 4c Kl-300x82 in

As a Brit working in a German environment I had a certain amount of adjusting to do here – there are the PR rules, for example, dealing with journalists is different here as opposed to in the UK, and then there are huge differences in client and agency-internal relationships, which are primarily underlined by the language. In German there are two forms of the word “you” – the politer “Sie” form and the “I’m on your level” “Du” form – this defines and maintains certain relationships – a complication that we do not have in the English language.

After working in Germany and in the PR industry for over 15 years, I have pretty much got to used to working here and so, it was with much excitement that we at Sympra co-founded the Public Relations Network (PRN) in 2005. I had visions of stuffy conference rooms filled with gesticulating Italians, highly-efficient and impatient Germans, and the late-comers from all over Europe! I am not going to say that I was completely wrong but I will say this – public relations is different in countries all over the world but public relations experts are surprisingly similar!

I must add here that one of our preconditions for joining the PRN is a strong vetting service that we carry out – obviously when selecting agencies we need ones that work in similar fields so our customers can rely on experts in the chosen country as well as the pricing being similar to ours (so we don’t have to reanimate our clients after showing them cost proposals), but our “personal” vetting service is in place so we can guarantee that we, and more importantly, our clients can work with these people – the world is smaller than we think, and people actually more similar than we can imagine!

So, now we have our Network – a hand-picked, and it really is hand-picked, selection of incredibly personable communication experts around the globe. International public relations may seem an impossible and insurmountable task at the beginning but if you are on a wavelength with your partners, then it is easier than you think. To our customers in Germany: The same rule applies as with drafting a national PR strategy – know roughly what you want to achieve, listen to the advice given by the experts of that country as they know their press and their market and then, simply lean back and enjoy being called “you”!